<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Political Transparency</title><description>ReframeIt.com comments in Political Transparency</description><link>http://reframeit.com/groups/96Lperh4CN9/comments</link><item><title>From Nearly Dead To Nearly Done: How The White House Refocused On Health Care To Finish It Off | TPMDC</title><description>bobby made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="From Nearly Dead To Nearly Done: How The White House Refocused On Health Care To Finish It Off | TPMDC @ http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/02/from-nearly-dead-to-revived-how-the-white-house-refocused-on-health-care-to-finish-it-off.php?ref=fpblg" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Ftpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com%252F2010%252F02%252Ffrom-nearly-dead-to-revived-how-the-white-house-refocused-on-health-care-to-finish-it-off.php%253Fref%253Dfpblg"&gt;From Nearly Dead To Nearly Done: How The White House Refocused On Health Care To Finish It Off | TPMDC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;bobby's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This seems to be a pretty clear account of what happened in the last month politically to health care reform and to the public option. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;From Nearly Dead To Nearly Done: How The White House Refocused On Health Care To Finish It Off
Christina Bellantoni | February 23, 2010, 7:27PM</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:13:28 +0000</pubDate><author>bobby</author><comment>This seems to be a pretty clear account of what happened in the last month politically to health care reform and to the public option. </comment><reference_text>From Nearly Dead To Nearly Done: How The White House Refocused On Health Care To Finish It Off
Christina Bellantoni | February 23, 2010, 7:27PM</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/Cr657inRs6W</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/Cr657inRs6W</guid></item><item><title>CDD: When the People Speak: Chapter One</title><description>Bucky made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="CDD: When the People Speak: Chapter One @ http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/whenthepeoplespeak" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Fcdd.stanford.edu%252Fresearch%252Fwhenthepeoplespeak"&gt;CDD: When the People Speak: Chapter One&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Bucky's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Consider the case of 911:
The public doesn't understand the facts of the controlled demolition that occurred. Visit website AE911truth please. Thank you.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Raw public opinion is routinely voiced by all the established institutions of mass democracy&#8212;initiatives, referendums, public opinion polls, focus groups.</description><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 02:55:42 +0000</pubDate><author>Bucky</author><comment>Consider the case of 911:
The public doesn't understand the facts of the controlled demolition that occurred. Visit website AE911truth please. Thank you.</comment><reference_text>Raw public opinion is routinely voiced by all the established institutions of mass democracy&#8212;initiatives, referendums, public opinion polls, focus groups.</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/7XuDvnsnW5b</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/7XuDvnsnW5b</guid></item><item><title>CDD: When the People Speak: Chapter One</title><description>bobby made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="CDD: When the People Speak: Chapter One @ http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/whenthepeoplespeak" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Fcdd.stanford.edu%252Fresearch%252Fwhenthepeoplespeak"&gt;CDD: When the People Speak: Chapter One&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;bobby's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I'm fascinated by this cycle. Uninformed citizens voice their opinions to pollsters. Pollsters then influence the media to articulate over time the solidity of public opinion. In fact, there are often certain facts, which, if widely known, would cause public opinion to be quite different. But instead our society is subjected to a self-destructive spiral in which uninformed top-of-the-head reactions get recycled as  news and ultimately as mandates for politicians to act in ways that are often not in the interests of the people whose opinions they claim to be listening to. It is a very important element of Deliberative Polling that the interests of ordinary citizens are not gathered from the elite who think they know better, but rather gathered from the people when they are in a condition in which they would know better. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Raw public opinion is routinely voiced by all the established institutions of mass democracy&#8212;initiatives, referendums, public opinion polls, focus groups.</description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:19:43 +0000</pubDate><author>bobby</author><comment>I'm fascinated by this cycle. Uninformed citizens voice their opinions to pollsters. Pollsters then influence the media to articulate over time the solidity of public opinion. In fact, there are often certain facts, which, if widely known, would cause public opinion to be quite different. But instead our society is subjected to a self-destructive spiral in which uninformed top-of-the-head reactions get recycled as  news and ultimately as mandates for politicians to act in ways that are often not in the interests of the people whose opinions they claim to be listening to. It is a very important element of Deliberative Polling that the interests of ordinary citizens are not gathered from the elite who think they know better, but rather gathered from the people when they are in a condition in which they would know better. </comment><reference_text>Raw public opinion is routinely voiced by all the established institutions of mass democracy&#8212;initiatives, referendums, public opinion polls, focus groups.</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/89yWTUwX1Up</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/89yWTUwX1Up</guid></item><item><title>Cuomo Files Antitrust Suit Against Intel - NYTimes.com</title><description>Maximilian made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="Cuomo Files Antitrust Suit Against Intel - NYTimes.com @ http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/05/technology/companies/05chip.html" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.nytimes.com%252F2009%252F11%252F05%252Ftechnology%252Fcompanies%252F05chip.html"&gt;Cuomo Files Antitrust Suit Against Intel - NYTimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Maximilian's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This seems to be a repeating motif in Intel's business practices whether it be in Asia, Europe, and the United States. I will be watching this closely to see how it pans out. 
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&#8220;Rather than compete fairly, Intel used bribery and coercion to maintain a stranglehold on the market,&#8221; Mr. Cuomo said in a statement. &#8220;Intel&#8217;s actions not only unfairly restricted potential competitors, but also hurt average consumers who were robbed of better products and lower prices.&#8221;</description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:16:09 +0000</pubDate><author>Maximilian</author><comment>This seems to be a repeating motif in Intel's business practices whether it be in Asia, Europe, and the United States. I will be watching this closely to see how it pans out. 
</comment><reference_text>&#8220;Rather than compete fairly, Intel used bribery and coercion to maintain a stranglehold on the market,&#8221; Mr. Cuomo said in a statement. &#8220;Intel&#8217;s actions not only unfairly restricted potential competitors, but also hurt average consumers who were robbed of better products and lower prices.&#8221;</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/3mcXSssW5sg</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/3mcXSssW5sg</guid></item><item><title>FCC plan for open internet 'perfect,' Lessig says; industry critical -- DailyFinance</title><description>shelly123 made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="FCC plan for open internet 'perfect,' Lessig says; industry critical -- DailyFinance @ http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/09/21/fcc-plan-for-open-internet-perfect-lessig-says-atandt-verizon" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.dailyfinance.com%252F2009%252F09%252F21%252Ffcc-plan-for-open-internet-perfect-lessig-says-atandt-verizon"&gt;FCC plan for open internet 'perfect,' Lessig says; industry critical -- DailyFinance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;shelly123's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Pretty nice..
Shelly Smith..
=======================
&lt;a href="http://auctions.fastrealestate.net"&gt;foreclosed home auctions&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The U.S. on Monday announced a bold plan designed to keep the internet open and competitive and prevent web-service providers from unfairly discriminating against content that competes with their offerings. "It was perfect. I'm thrilled," Lawrence Lessig, the prominent Stanford law professor and pro-net neutrality advocate, told DailyFinance after the plan was unveiled. "The commission is clearly focused on creating a policy that supports innovation on the internet."</description><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:00:34 +0000</pubDate><author>shelly123</author><comment>Pretty nice..
Shelly Smith..
=======================
&lt;a href="http://auctions.fastrealestate.net"&gt;foreclosed home auctions&lt;/a&gt; </comment><reference_text>The U.S. on Monday announced a bold plan designed to keep the internet open and competitive and prevent web-service providers from unfairly discriminating against content that competes with their offerings. "It was perfect. I'm thrilled," Lawrence Lessig, the prominent Stanford law professor and pro-net neutrality advocate, told DailyFinance after the plan was unveiled. "The commission is clearly focused on creating a policy that supports innovation on the internet."</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/4CPeeVMb4WT</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/4CPeeVMb4WT</guid></item><item><title>2030: A Perfect Storm of food, water and energy shortages?</title><description>Vbox made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="2030: A Perfect Storm of food, water and energy shortages? @ http://www.americainfra.com/news/perfect-storm" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.americainfra.com%252Fnews%252Fperfect-storm"&gt;2030: A Perfect Storm of food, water and energy shortages?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Vbox's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I can't believe in a blink of an eye how much damage my body went through in the last 21 years as well Maximillian.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2030: A Perfect Storm of food, water and energy shortages?</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:50:26 +0000</pubDate><author>Vbox</author><comment>I can't believe in a blink of an eye how much damage my body went through in the last 21 years as well Maximillian.</comment><reference_text>2030: A Perfect Storm of food, water and energy shortages?</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/6b1a6XqWvEV</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/6b1a6XqWvEV</guid></item><item><title>FCC plan for open internet 'perfect,' Lessig says; industry critical -- DailyFinance</title><description>Maximilian made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="FCC plan for open internet 'perfect,' Lessig says; industry critical -- DailyFinance @ http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/09/21/fcc-plan-for-open-internet-perfect-lessig-says-atandt-verizon" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.dailyfinance.com%252F2009%252F09%252F21%252Ffcc-plan-for-open-internet-perfect-lessig-says-atandt-verizon"&gt;FCC plan for open internet 'perfect,' Lessig says; industry critical -- DailyFinance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Maximilian's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is great! I love that the FCC has become a reasonable, logical, and innovative regulatory institution. Other regulatory bodies need to follow in the FCC's suit to reflect the changes in society, technology, and business.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The U.S. on Monday announced a bold plan designed to keep the internet open and competitive and prevent web-service providers from unfairly discriminating against content that competes with their offerings. "It was perfect. I'm thrilled," Lawrence Lessig, the prominent Stanford law professor and pro-net neutrality advocate, told DailyFinance after the plan was unveiled. "The commission is clearly focused on creating a policy that supports innovation on the internet."</description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:54:14 +0000</pubDate><author>Maximilian</author><comment>This is great! I love that the FCC has become a reasonable, logical, and innovative regulatory institution. Other regulatory bodies need to follow in the FCC's suit to reflect the changes in society, technology, and business.
</comment><reference_text>The U.S. on Monday announced a bold plan designed to keep the internet open and competitive and prevent web-service providers from unfairly discriminating against content that competes with their offerings. "It was perfect. I'm thrilled," Lawrence Lessig, the prominent Stanford law professor and pro-net neutrality advocate, told DailyFinance after the plan was unveiled. "The commission is clearly focused on creating a policy that supports innovation on the internet."</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/5W0mRKPC0LY</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/5W0mRKPC0LY</guid></item><item><title>Which is better for the planet, beer or wine? - By Nina Shen Rastogi - Slate Magazine</title><description>Maximilian made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="Which is better for the planet, beer or wine? - By Nina Shen Rastogi - Slate Magazine @ http://www.slate.com/id/2229095" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.slate.com%252Fid%252F2229095"&gt;Which is better for the planet, beer or wine? - By Nina Shen Rastogi - Slate Magazine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Maximilian's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is so awesome. Only Slate would feature an article on which has less of a carbon footprint; beer or wine.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Drink ResponsiblyWhich is better for the planet, beer or wine?</description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:39:28 +0000</pubDate><author>Maximilian</author><comment>This is so awesome. Only Slate would feature an article on which has less of a carbon footprint; beer or wine.
</comment><reference_text>Drink ResponsiblyWhich is better for the planet, beer or wine?</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/16I1uFKk-PI</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/16I1uFKk-PI</guid></item><item><title>Fed, Seeing Recovery, Holds Steady on Rates - NYTimes.com</title><description>Maximilian made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="Fed, Seeing Recovery, Holds Steady on Rates - NYTimes.com @ http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/24/business/economy/24fed.html" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.nytimes.com%252F2009%252F09%252F24%252Fbusiness%252Feconomy%252F24fed.html"&gt;Fed, Seeing Recovery, Holds Steady on Rates - NYTimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Maximilian's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This sounds great and everything to me but the things that I wonder about is the huge amount of money that we put into circulation and the means and methods that we have of removing the exacts funds we put into circulation so that we can curb rampant inflation if it happens. 
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But the Fed also gave itself ample room to keep interest rates low, saying that inflation would remain &#8220;subdued for some time.&#8221;</description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:20:33 +0000</pubDate><author>Maximilian</author><comment>This sounds great and everything to me but the things that I wonder about is the huge amount of money that we put into circulation and the means and methods that we have of removing the exacts funds we put into circulation so that we can curb rampant inflation if it happens. 
</comment><reference_text>But the Fed also gave itself ample room to keep interest rates low, saying that inflation would remain &#8220;subdued for some time.&#8221;</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/CHzEbkeD8TV</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/CHzEbkeD8TV</guid></item><item><title>60% living paycheck to paycheck - Smart Spending Blog - MSN Money</title><description>Maximilian made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="60% living paycheck to paycheck - Smart Spending Blog - MSN Money @ http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/smartspending/archive/2009/09/22/60-living-paycheck-to-paycheck.aspx" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Fblogs.moneycentral.msn.com%252Fsmartspending%252Farchive%252F2009%252F09%252F22%252F60-living-paycheck-to-paycheck.aspx"&gt;60% living paycheck to paycheck - Smart Spending Blog - MSN Money&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Maximilian's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is a really interesting statistic and I am wondering how they got these numbers? But nonetheless it still is a really informative article.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thirty percent of workers with salaries of $100,000 or more report that they too live paycheck to paycheck, versus 21% in 2008.</description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:54:02 +0000</pubDate><author>Maximilian</author><comment>This is a really interesting statistic and I am wondering how they got these numbers? But nonetheless it still is a really informative article.
</comment><reference_text>Thirty percent of workers with salaries of $100,000 or more report that they too live paycheck to paycheck, versus 21% in 2008.</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/5XuKQWR3HmD</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/5XuKQWR3HmD</guid></item></channel></rss><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Political Transparency</title><description>ReframeIt.com comments in Political Transparency</description><link>http://reframeit.com/groups/96Lperh4CN9/comments</link><item><title>From Nearly Dead To Nearly Done: How The White House Refocused On Health Care To Finish It Off | TPMDC</title><description>bobby made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="From Nearly Dead To Nearly Done: How The White House Refocused On Health Care To Finish It Off | TPMDC @ http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/02/from-nearly-dead-to-revived-how-the-white-house-refocused-on-health-care-to-finish-it-off.php?ref=fpblg" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Ftpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com%252F2010%252F02%252Ffrom-nearly-dead-to-revived-how-the-white-house-refocused-on-health-care-to-finish-it-off.php%253Fref%253Dfpblg"&gt;From Nearly Dead To Nearly Done: How The White House Refocused On Health Care To Finish It Off | TPMDC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;bobby's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This seems to be a pretty clear account of what happened in the last month politically to health care reform and to the public option. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;From Nearly Dead To Nearly Done: How The White House Refocused On Health Care To Finish It Off
Christina Bellantoni | February 23, 2010, 7:27PM</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:13:28 +0000</pubDate><author>bobby</author><comment>This seems to be a pretty clear account of what happened in the last month politically to health care reform and to the public option. </comment><reference_text>From Nearly Dead To Nearly Done: How The White House Refocused On Health Care To Finish It Off
Christina Bellantoni | February 23, 2010, 7:27PM</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/Cr657inRs6W</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/Cr657inRs6W</guid></item><item><title>CDD: When the People Speak: Chapter One</title><description>Bucky made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="CDD: When the People Speak: Chapter One @ http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/whenthepeoplespeak" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Fcdd.stanford.edu%252Fresearch%252Fwhenthepeoplespeak"&gt;CDD: When the People Speak: Chapter One&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Bucky's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Consider the case of 911:
The public doesn't understand the facts of the controlled demolition that occurred. Visit website AE911truth please. Thank you.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Raw public opinion is routinely voiced by all the established institutions of mass democracy&#8212;initiatives, referendums, public opinion polls, focus groups.</description><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 02:55:42 +0000</pubDate><author>Bucky</author><comment>Consider the case of 911:
The public doesn't understand the facts of the controlled demolition that occurred. Visit website AE911truth please. Thank you.</comment><reference_text>Raw public opinion is routinely voiced by all the established institutions of mass democracy&#8212;initiatives, referendums, public opinion polls, focus groups.</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/7XuDvnsnW5b</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/7XuDvnsnW5b</guid></item><item><title>CDD: When the People Speak: Chapter One</title><description>bobby made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="CDD: When the People Speak: Chapter One @ http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/whenthepeoplespeak" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Fcdd.stanford.edu%252Fresearch%252Fwhenthepeoplespeak"&gt;CDD: When the People Speak: Chapter One&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;bobby's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I'm fascinated by this cycle. Uninformed citizens voice their opinions to pollsters. Pollsters then influence the media to articulate over time the solidity of public opinion. In fact, there are often certain facts, which, if widely known, would cause public opinion to be quite different. But instead our society is subjected to a self-destructive spiral in which uninformed top-of-the-head reactions get recycled as  news and ultimately as mandates for politicians to act in ways that are often not in the interests of the people whose opinions they claim to be listening to. It is a very important element of Deliberative Polling that the interests of ordinary citizens are not gathered from the elite who think they know better, but rather gathered from the people when they are in a condition in which they would know better. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Raw public opinion is routinely voiced by all the established institutions of mass democracy&#8212;initiatives, referendums, public opinion polls, focus groups.</description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:19:43 +0000</pubDate><author>bobby</author><comment>I'm fascinated by this cycle. Uninformed citizens voice their opinions to pollsters. Pollsters then influence the media to articulate over time the solidity of public opinion. In fact, there are often certain facts, which, if widely known, would cause public opinion to be quite different. But instead our society is subjected to a self-destructive spiral in which uninformed top-of-the-head reactions get recycled as  news and ultimately as mandates for politicians to act in ways that are often not in the interests of the people whose opinions they claim to be listening to. It is a very important element of Deliberative Polling that the interests of ordinary citizens are not gathered from the elite who think they know better, but rather gathered from the people when they are in a condition in which they would know better. </comment><reference_text>Raw public opinion is routinely voiced by all the established institutions of mass democracy&#8212;initiatives, referendums, public opinion polls, focus groups.</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/89yWTUwX1Up</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/89yWTUwX1Up</guid></item><item><title>Cuomo Files Antitrust Suit Against Intel - NYTimes.com</title><description>Maximilian made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="Cuomo Files Antitrust Suit Against Intel - NYTimes.com @ http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/05/technology/companies/05chip.html" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.nytimes.com%252F2009%252F11%252F05%252Ftechnology%252Fcompanies%252F05chip.html"&gt;Cuomo Files Antitrust Suit Against Intel - NYTimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Maximilian's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This seems to be a repeating motif in Intel's business practices whether it be in Asia, Europe, and the United States. I will be watching this closely to see how it pans out. 
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&#8220;Rather than compete fairly, Intel used bribery and coercion to maintain a stranglehold on the market,&#8221; Mr. Cuomo said in a statement. &#8220;Intel&#8217;s actions not only unfairly restricted potential competitors, but also hurt average consumers who were robbed of better products and lower prices.&#8221;</description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:16:09 +0000</pubDate><author>Maximilian</author><comment>This seems to be a repeating motif in Intel's business practices whether it be in Asia, Europe, and the United States. I will be watching this closely to see how it pans out. 
</comment><reference_text>&#8220;Rather than compete fairly, Intel used bribery and coercion to maintain a stranglehold on the market,&#8221; Mr. Cuomo said in a statement. &#8220;Intel&#8217;s actions not only unfairly restricted potential competitors, but also hurt average consumers who were robbed of better products and lower prices.&#8221;</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/3mcXSssW5sg</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/3mcXSssW5sg</guid></item><item><title>FCC plan for open internet 'perfect,' Lessig says; industry critical -- DailyFinance</title><description>shelly123 made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="FCC plan for open internet 'perfect,' Lessig says; industry critical -- DailyFinance @ http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/09/21/fcc-plan-for-open-internet-perfect-lessig-says-atandt-verizon" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.dailyfinance.com%252F2009%252F09%252F21%252Ffcc-plan-for-open-internet-perfect-lessig-says-atandt-verizon"&gt;FCC plan for open internet 'perfect,' Lessig says; industry critical -- DailyFinance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;shelly123's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Pretty nice..
Shelly Smith..
=======================
&lt;a href="http://auctions.fastrealestate.net"&gt;foreclosed home auctions&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The U.S. on Monday announced a bold plan designed to keep the internet open and competitive and prevent web-service providers from unfairly discriminating against content that competes with their offerings. "It was perfect. I'm thrilled," Lawrence Lessig, the prominent Stanford law professor and pro-net neutrality advocate, told DailyFinance after the plan was unveiled. "The commission is clearly focused on creating a policy that supports innovation on the internet."</description><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:00:34 +0000</pubDate><author>shelly123</author><comment>Pretty nice..
Shelly Smith..
=======================
&lt;a href="http://auctions.fastrealestate.net"&gt;foreclosed home auctions&lt;/a&gt; </comment><reference_text>The U.S. on Monday announced a bold plan designed to keep the internet open and competitive and prevent web-service providers from unfairly discriminating against content that competes with their offerings. "It was perfect. I'm thrilled," Lawrence Lessig, the prominent Stanford law professor and pro-net neutrality advocate, told DailyFinance after the plan was unveiled. "The commission is clearly focused on creating a policy that supports innovation on the internet."</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/4CPeeVMb4WT</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/4CPeeVMb4WT</guid></item><item><title>2030: A Perfect Storm of food, water and energy shortages?</title><description>Vbox made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="2030: A Perfect Storm of food, water and energy shortages? @ http://www.americainfra.com/news/perfect-storm" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.americainfra.com%252Fnews%252Fperfect-storm"&gt;2030: A Perfect Storm of food, water and energy shortages?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Vbox's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I can't believe in a blink of an eye how much damage my body went through in the last 21 years as well Maximillian.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2030: A Perfect Storm of food, water and energy shortages?</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:50:26 +0000</pubDate><author>Vbox</author><comment>I can't believe in a blink of an eye how much damage my body went through in the last 21 years as well Maximillian.</comment><reference_text>2030: A Perfect Storm of food, water and energy shortages?</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/6b1a6XqWvEV</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/6b1a6XqWvEV</guid></item><item><title>FCC plan for open internet 'perfect,' Lessig says; industry critical -- DailyFinance</title><description>Maximilian made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="FCC plan for open internet 'perfect,' Lessig says; industry critical -- DailyFinance @ http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/09/21/fcc-plan-for-open-internet-perfect-lessig-says-atandt-verizon" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.dailyfinance.com%252F2009%252F09%252F21%252Ffcc-plan-for-open-internet-perfect-lessig-says-atandt-verizon"&gt;FCC plan for open internet 'perfect,' Lessig says; industry critical -- DailyFinance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Maximilian's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is great! I love that the FCC has become a reasonable, logical, and innovative regulatory institution. Other regulatory bodies need to follow in the FCC's suit to reflect the changes in society, technology, and business.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The U.S. on Monday announced a bold plan designed to keep the internet open and competitive and prevent web-service providers from unfairly discriminating against content that competes with their offerings. "It was perfect. I'm thrilled," Lawrence Lessig, the prominent Stanford law professor and pro-net neutrality advocate, told DailyFinance after the plan was unveiled. "The commission is clearly focused on creating a policy that supports innovation on the internet."</description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:54:14 +0000</pubDate><author>Maximilian</author><comment>This is great! I love that the FCC has become a reasonable, logical, and innovative regulatory institution. Other regulatory bodies need to follow in the FCC's suit to reflect the changes in society, technology, and business.
</comment><reference_text>The U.S. on Monday announced a bold plan designed to keep the internet open and competitive and prevent web-service providers from unfairly discriminating against content that competes with their offerings. "It was perfect. I'm thrilled," Lawrence Lessig, the prominent Stanford law professor and pro-net neutrality advocate, told DailyFinance after the plan was unveiled. "The commission is clearly focused on creating a policy that supports innovation on the internet."</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/5W0mRKPC0LY</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/5W0mRKPC0LY</guid></item><item><title>Which is better for the planet, beer or wine? - By Nina Shen Rastogi - Slate Magazine</title><description>Maximilian made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="Which is better for the planet, beer or wine? - By Nina Shen Rastogi - Slate Magazine @ http://www.slate.com/id/2229095" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.slate.com%252Fid%252F2229095"&gt;Which is better for the planet, beer or wine? - By Nina Shen Rastogi - Slate Magazine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Maximilian's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is so awesome. Only Slate would feature an article on which has less of a carbon footprint; beer or wine.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Drink ResponsiblyWhich is better for the planet, beer or wine?</description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:39:28 +0000</pubDate><author>Maximilian</author><comment>This is so awesome. Only Slate would feature an article on which has less of a carbon footprint; beer or wine.
</comment><reference_text>Drink ResponsiblyWhich is better for the planet, beer or wine?</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/16I1uFKk-PI</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/16I1uFKk-PI</guid></item><item><title>Fed, Seeing Recovery, Holds Steady on Rates - NYTimes.com</title><description>Maximilian made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="Fed, Seeing Recovery, Holds Steady on Rates - NYTimes.com @ http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/24/business/economy/24fed.html" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.nytimes.com%252F2009%252F09%252F24%252Fbusiness%252Feconomy%252F24fed.html"&gt;Fed, Seeing Recovery, Holds Steady on Rates - NYTimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Maximilian's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This sounds great and everything to me but the things that I wonder about is the huge amount of money that we put into circulation and the means and methods that we have of removing the exacts funds we put into circulation so that we can curb rampant inflation if it happens. 
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But the Fed also gave itself ample room to keep interest rates low, saying that inflation would remain &#8220;subdued for some time.&#8221;</description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:20:33 +0000</pubDate><author>Maximilian</author><comment>This sounds great and everything to me but the things that I wonder about is the huge amount of money that we put into circulation and the means and methods that we have of removing the exacts funds we put into circulation so that we can curb rampant inflation if it happens. 
</comment><reference_text>But the Fed also gave itself ample room to keep interest rates low, saying that inflation would remain &#8220;subdued for some time.&#8221;</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/CHzEbkeD8TV</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/CHzEbkeD8TV</guid></item><item><title>60% living paycheck to paycheck - Smart Spending Blog - MSN Money</title><description>Maximilian made a new comment on:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a class="" rel="" title="60% living paycheck to paycheck - Smart Spending Blog - MSN Money @ http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/smartspending/archive/2009/09/22/60-living-paycheck-to-paycheck.aspx" href="http://reframeit.com/pages?uri=http%253A%252F%252Fblogs.moneycentral.msn.com%252Fsmartspending%252Farchive%252F2009%252F09%252F22%252F60-living-paycheck-to-paycheck.aspx"&gt;60% living paycheck to paycheck - Smart Spending Blog - MSN Money&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Maximilian's comment is:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is a really interesting statistic and I am wondering how they got these numbers? But nonetheless it still is a really informative article.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment references the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thirty percent of workers with salaries of $100,000 or more report that they too live paycheck to paycheck, versus 21% in 2008.</description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:54:02 +0000</pubDate><author>Maximilian</author><comment>This is a really interesting statistic and I am wondering how they got these numbers? But nonetheless it still is a really informative article.
</comment><reference_text>Thirty percent of workers with salaries of $100,000 or more report that they too live paycheck to paycheck, versus 21% in 2008.</reference_text><link>http://reframeit.com/comments/5XuKQWR3HmD</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://reframeit.com/comments/5XuKQWR3HmD</guid></item></channel></rss>